tesla

You are currently browsing articles tagged tesla.


Photo: Elizabeth Blackstock

When I saw the 2022 Mercedes-Benz EQS450+ in person, I laughed out loud, the same way I’d laugh at an ugly-cute goofy pug with a silly face and a perpetually stuck-out tongue. What on earth is this? Why do you look like that, huh? Aw, such a cutie!

Advertisement

The EQS450+ was my first experience with a Mercedes-Benz, and it was certainly a confounding one. I had a great time. I was also confused. I loved it but had no desire to ever own it or be seen driving it on a daily basis. It’s the kind of vehicle that requires you to see the reflection of beauty through a not-so-beautiful veneer — and honestly, I love that for the EQS.

Full Disclosure: Mercedes provided the EQS450+ to A Girls Guide to Cars during our three-day test drive of multiple vehicles. I got a chance to take it for a short spin. All opinions are my own.

Photo: Elizabeth Blackstock

Photo: Elizabeth Blackstock

What Is It?

The all-new EQS is Mercedes’ first effort at using a platform exclusively designed for electric models, and it’s also the first fully-electric vehicle from the brand’s EQ line to make it over here to North America.

Advertisement

I drove the Pinnacle trim of the Mercedes-Benz EQS450+ during my test drive. The standard model includes the following features:

  • $102,310 starting price
  • 329 horsepower and 419 lb-ft of torque
  • One motor, rear-wheel drive
  • Adaptive air suspension and rear-wheel steering
  • 107.8 kWh usable battery capacity
  • 350 miles EPA-estimated range
  • 0.20 drag coefficient
  • 70 percent charge in 35 minutes with a DC fast charger
  • 11 hours and 15 minute charge for Level 2 charger

The model I drove also added:

  • The 56-inch curved Hyperscreen ($7,230)
  • Augmented reality head-up display ($2,000)
  • Exclusive Trim ($1,575) that added things like massaging seats, four-zone climate control, and an in-dash climate menu

Advertisement

There’s also a much more powerful EQS580 trim if you want its 516 horsepower and 611 lb-ft of torque. Its $120,000 starting price is also much higher.

Photo: Elizabeth Blackstock

Advertisement

Photo: Elizabeth Blackstock

Okay, Let’s Talk About Those Looks

The Mercedes-AMG EQS 450+ is kind of cute in an ugly way, like how you look at a porpoise and think, “That is the cutest thing I’ve ever seen.” That largely comes down to two descriptors I can only think to describe as Long and Round.

Advertisement

You’ll probably hear some reviewers talk about sleek lines or futuristic curves that cut through the air with excellent aerodynamic efficiency. Not me. This car is goofy-looking as hell from the outside, and I absolutely adore it for that reason. It’s not sexy. It’s not pretty. It’s not really classy. It’s a shapely blob, for which I am sure there is a market.

But that shapely blobbiness is great for anyone who spends their time inside this car. The 126.4-inch wheelbase makes for a spacious interior where rear-seat passengers will luxuriate in plenty of arm and legroom. It’s also comfortable for a shorter driver like myself, which can be a difficult feat for a larger sedan.

Advertisement

It’s ultra luxurious, reminiscent of the standard S-Class sedan in the sense that you can climb behind the wheel and feel right at home — as long as your home features headrest pillows, ambient lighting, massaging leather seats, and a near-executive rear seat.

The strangest part, though, was climbing in and being surrounded by screens. I’ll talk more about the tech below, but the Wall Of Screen was a serious contrast to what was otherwise a warm and comfortable interior. The addition of mega-screens makes the EQS feel cold and utilitarian inside. That’s fine if that’s the vibe you’re going for — a lot of automakers think ‘electric’ must equal ‘spartan and modern’ — but it just didn’t work for me. That’s an aesthetic you have to commit to all the way through the interior of the car, and that’s not what happened here.

Advertisement

Photo: Elizabeth Blackstock

Photo: Elizabeth Blackstock

Advertisement

How Does The Mercedes-Benz EQS450+ Drive?

I can’t give you many comparisons here. This was my first time driving a Mercedes, so I can’t compare the EQS to a combustion-engined S-Class. I also can’t compare it to its Tesla or Lucid competitors in the EV world. I can only give you my vacuum impressions. You may do with them what you will.

Advertisement

That being said, the drive in the Mercedes-Benz EQS450+ was delicious. There’s an exceptional blend of power and lightness that makes for a really unique experience behind the wheel. If you’re cruising on the highway or through a subdivision, you’ll feel like you’re floating on a magic carpet. The Benz absorbs all the bumps, and its near-silent cabin creates a feeling of isolation. It’s just you, hovering around through the world.

But if you’re taking a sharp turn or accelerating, the EQS450+ really highlights where EVs shine. All that torque goes immediately to the wheels, so all your throttle inputs will be instantaneous. It’s a really satisfying feeling that reminds me of the days when I used to go for long-distance runs, where I’d hit mile five and find this groove where I felt powerful, like every step I took was propelling me through the world both physically and metaphorically. I felt grounded.

Advertisement

The transition between floating and settling down into the pavement isn’t jarring, either. You can feel the Benz hunker down and make the most of that minimal drag coefficient as you press the throttle. It’s an incredible experience.

Photo: Elizabeth Blackstock

Advertisement

Photo: Elizabeth Blackstock

Photo: Elizabeth Blackstock

Advertisement

An SUV Masquerading As A Sedan

Because of its length and weight, the Mercedes-Benz EQS 450+ feels a lot more like an SUV than it does a sedan. It’s not cumbersome to drive or park, but you can never shake the sense that you’re driving an absolutely massive piece of machinery. It reminded me of a more tech-heavy version of my 1996 Suburban than it does a traditional sedan — but that’s probably not a terrible thing for a market that wants Really Big Vehicles.

Advertisement

The electric motor provides instant torque, and you’ll get 10-degree rear-axle steering, so this car doesn’t handle like an SUV in certain ways. You can swing into a tight space at the grocery store no problem. You can jump from start instantly. But I couldn’t shake the feeling that I had a formidable yacht around me, an absolute beast of the sea. It was heavy, though not impossible to maneuver. It was large but not impossible to drive. It’s all those Large Parts of an SUV without the higher hip height. It makes for a bit of a strange driving experience.

Advertisement

Photo: Elizabeth Blackstock

Photo: Elizabeth Blackstock

Advertisement

I Don’t Know What To Do With All This Tech

My husband used to be a sales associate at a Mercedes-Benz dealership in Montreal, and he’s spent the entire duration of our marriage telling me that no automaker is as luxuriously high-tech as Mercedes. I have never discounted this observation. I’ve just also never felt the need to drive an extremely tech-heavy car. I still have a hard time dealing with a tiny infotainment screen.

Advertisement

So I think it’s probably a little bit of an understatement to say that the EQS’s offerings are a bit overwhelming. After I laughed out loud at the exterior, I also laughed out loud at the absolutely massive Hyperscreen. I wanted to ask it if it was compensating for something. I wanted to ask why such a cute fella needs such a big screen.

Functionally, the Hyperscreen is great. A single piece of curved glass, it’s a gorgeous feat of technological innovation that works with rapid speed due to an eight-core processor and 24 gigabytes of RAM. You tap on anything, and there’s not going to be lag. You’re immediately transported to the place you chose to go in the infotainment system.

Advertisement

The graphics are also gorgeous, but again, it’s a little bit Much. There’s a screen for the driver, one of the passenger, and a tall screen in the center, and in those latter two, you can access everything from radio controls to vehicle settings to satellite maps to photo galleries to video games. I did poke around the Tetris game and found it took a while to load but was otherwise fun. I still can’t imagine myself using an infotainment screen instead of my phone for gaming, though.

Even worse, you still get a lot of glare, despite the fact that Mercedes tried its best to avoid that. There’s not really anything you’re going to be able to do about the reflection of the sun when it’s especially bright.

Advertisement

You can also navigate with conversational commands after saying, “Hey Mercedes.” As in, you can say something like, “Hey Mercedes, I want coffee,” and your car will find you the nearest coffee spots. I used to hate voice commands because it was next to impossible to actually get what you were asking for, but this modern iteration that you see on luxury cars has really changed the game. I don’t have to think up the robotic command I’d need to change the radio station. I can just say it.

The digital dashboard was also one hell of a feature. You can cycle through tons of different displays, most of which are just mind boggling. You can literally have your navigation map displayed on your dashboard — and I don’t mean you get a little box that has navigation. The whole screen turns into a map. I’m sure some folks will enjoy it, but it was massively overwhelming for me.

Advertisement

As was the augmented reality navigation, which feels a little bit more video game-y than anything else. Maybe I’m just too old to appreciate these things.

Photo: Elizabeth Blackstock

Advertisement

The Verdict

It’s difficult to offer a verdict for a car that I can’t compare to the other vehicles in its class, I can say that the 2022 Mercedes-Benz EQS450+ is a delightful vehicle that transforms much of what makes Mercedes special into a flagship luxury sedan — but it does feel like the German automaker couldn’t decide what it wanted to do. It tried to combine modern austerity with Benz’s traditional elegance, and it works… but it’s probably not going to work for everyone. It didn’t work for me, but it could very well work for you. And you know what? I respect a delightfully polarizing car.

Advertisement

Photo: Elizabeth Blackstock

Photo: Elizabeth Blackstock

For GREAT deals on a new or used Chevrolet check out Antelope Valley Chevrolet TODAY!

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


Photo: AP (AP)

Automakers in Britain are sad, some car buyers are resorting to new tactics, and Elon Musk. All that and more in The Morning Shift for December 23, 2021.

Advertisement

1st Gear: Car Buyers Are Searching Far Afield

Before the pandemic, my standard advice to people who had the luxury of time and a little extra money was to not be afraid to expand your search for a new or used car to well beyond your local area. What you might value in a car is very different than what someone in Topeka or Columbus or Phoenix or New York City might value, and vice versa, so deals could often be found if you were willing to make a little adventure of it.

Now, with the pandemic and the chip shortage, people are being forced to look beyond their local markets for cars whether they want to or not, according to The New York Times. That’s not even for deals or to get something interesting, but just to get the normie car they want. It is either travel, or wait. Desperate times, desperate measures, etc.

Take this poor woman, who had to travel over 500 miles for a Ford Escape SE Plug-In Hybrid:

When Rachael Kasper started shopping for a new car in August, she had her heart set on a Ford Escape plug-in hybrid. The problem was that Ford hasn’t made many of them this year because of a computer chip shortage that has slowed auto production around the world.

Ms. Kasper first came up empty in her home state of Michigan and, later, in neighboring states. When she expanded to the East Coast, she found one — at a dealership 537 miles away, in Hanover, Pa.

“I flew to Baltimore, took a Lyft to the dealer, and then drove all the way home,” said Ms. Kasper, who owns a water-sports equipment retailer. “It was quite an adventure.”

Or this poor guy, who is stuck in purgatory waiting for his new Porsche Taycan:

As Ed Matovcik, a wine industry executive in Napa, Calif., neared the end of his lease on a Tesla Model S, he decided to switch to a Porsche Taycan, a German electric car. He ordered one, but it won’t arrive until May, three months after he has to give up the Tesla.

He is planning on renting cars until the Taycan arrives and is looking on the bright side. “It’s a different world now, so I don’t really mind the wait,” he said. “I’m thinking of renting a pickup for a week so I can finally clear out my garage.”

Advertisement

Or this poor guy, who simply wanted a used Ford EcoSport at a reasonable price and, when he couldn’t find that, decided to own his son:

Tom Maletic, a retired medical sales executive in New Orleans, recently started shopping for a two- or three-year-old Ford EcoSport, a small sport-utility vehicle. He had hoped to find one with fewer than 20,000 miles priced around $15,000, which is what he paid for an EcoSport for his wife earlier in the year. “But it was 17, 18, 19, 21,000” dollars, he said. “And these were five years old, six years old, with a lot of miles on them.”

In the end, he flew to Michigan to take back a 2015 Ford Escape he had passed on to his son, and drove it the 1,100 miles back to New Orleans.

Advertisement

I’m hoping he showed up at his son’s place with as little notice as possible.

2nd Gear: Tesla CEO Elon Musk Sold More Tesla Stock

Over a million told Musk to sell ten percent of his Tesla stock last month, and Musk has since more or less done that, according to The Wall Street Journal.

The sales came as Mr. Musk exercised more than 2.1 million Tesla stock options, according to regulatory filings late Wednesday. He sold more than 934,000 of the shares in the company he runs, valued at around $928.6 million, to cover tax withholdings, the disclosures state.

The latest transactions are part of a plan Mr. Musk set on Sept. 14 to exercise options and sell shares. The options he’s exercised are part of a tranche of around 23 million vested stock options set to expire in August 2022. He has exercised about 21.3 million of those options.

Mr. Musk said Wednesday on Twitter before the filings became public, “There are still a few tranches left, but almost done.”

[…]

Mr. Musk held around 170.5 million Tesla shares when he posted the Twitter poll and pledged to sell 10% of those holdings. He has sold around 14.8 million shares so far, leaving him at least a little more than $2 million in stock sales short to meet his commitment. The precise number depends on how he defines his ownership stake.

Exercising Tesla stock options has netted Mr. Musk more shares than he held at the time of the Twitter poll. His Tesla stock holdings now top 177 million shares.

Advertisement

Elon Musk is filthy rich, reports say.

3rd Gear: CarMax Would Like To Congratulate Itself On A Good Year

CarMax made over $269 million in its latest fiscal quarter, on net revenue of over $8.5 billion, according to Automotive News.

“Our solid execution, customer-centric omni-channel strategy, and macro factors are driving strong performance across our diversified businesses,” CarMax Inc. CEO Bill Nash said in a statement Wednesday. “Our top line momentum continued into this quarter and we achieved record levels of third quarter unit sales in both retail and wholesale, generating all-time record revenues. We also bought more cars from customers than ever before.”

CarMax increased retail sales 17 percent year over year to 227,424 vehicles during the third quarter, which ended Nov. 30. Wholesale volume rose 49 percent to 187,630 vehicles.

On the supply side, CarMax nearly doubled the amount of vehicles it purchased directly from customers during the quarter. The company said it acquired about 194,000 of those 383,215 vehicles through its online instant appraisal feature.

Advertisement

I’ve always heard better things about CarMax than, say, Carvana.

4th Gear: British Automakers Produced The Least Amount Of Cars In November Since 1984

Automakers in Britain have been having a time of it just like everyone else, thought it is still startling to come across statistics like this, that they are having some of the worst times in decades.

Advertisement

From Reuters:

British car manufacturers had their slowest November in 37 years as the sector struggled to cope with the impact of the coronavirus pandemic on global supply chains, industry data showed on Thursday.

Car production fell by 28.7% compared with November 2021 to 75,756 units, despite a 53% increase in electric vehicle output, the Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders (SMMT) said.

It was the fifth consecutive month of decline and represented the worst November performance since 1984.

Advertisement

The main reason is what you think.

It the first 11 months of 2021, British car production of just under 800,000 units was down by 433,000 compared with 2019, before the pandemic hit.

“COVID is impacting supply chains massively, causing global shortages - especially of semiconductors - which is likely to affect the sector throughout next year,” Hawes said.

Advertisement

5th Gear: Man Gets New Job

Arndt Ellinghorst is a guy who the Financial Times calls “Europe’s top auto analyst,” and I’ll take their word for it. Ellinghorst is in the middle of getting out of the auto analysis game, though, and offered an exit interview of sorts with the FT, in which he criticizes legacy automakers for not doing enough to transform themselves and being caught flat-footed by the likes of Tesla.

“In the US people have taken a view that these companies are just metal benders,” says Ellinghorst, while in Europe, particularly in Germany, “the market has taken a view that the influence of labour unions, the co-determined supervisory boards make these companies too slow to restructure.” Recent drama in Wolfsburg has done little to dispel this notion.

But Ellinghorst also places a significant part of the blame on those sitting in boardrooms, who “treated their product with disrespect”. For years, he has been complaining that the industry has run an “overly volume centric business model”, a “stack-em-high” strategy that led to high fixed costs and higher break-even points, both hard to reduce in a cyclical downturn.

Then came Tesla, and executives (with the honourable exception of BMW, a pioneer that simply rolled out the technology too early) were “not fully convinced that they could transition their brand equity into the electric world,” until Dieselgate and regulation forced their hands, he says, recalling conversations with complacent German managers.

The VW brand has also recreated its complexity in the EV world, launching several similar models instead of focusing on one or two breakthrough products. VW, which will sell far fewer than the 600,000 electric vehicles it hoped to sell this year, partially due to a lack of semiconductors, “has not been convincing, both in terms of technical performance and the volume”.

Advertisement

This all rings true, if a little textbook, but who knows how VW or any of the other legacy automakers will do with EVs in the next decade; they have been around for decades and decades for a reason. I am down with this though:

Given these headwinds, what, I ask, is the bull case for Germany’s auto powerhouses?

Ellinghorst’s first two suggestions are unsurprising. Drastically reduce spending on combustion engines and petrol/diesel models, and be more rigorous on pricing, without which “all the restructuring is worth nothing”.

His third recommendation, however, does not come from an Excel spreadsheet. “The product must be exciting and emotional,” he says. “Porsche’s Taycan (which is outselling the 911) is probably the best example. It is so far the only example.”

Advertisement

The Mercedes EQS would like a word, but beyond that it is hard to argue with this take, which seems hotter and hotter the more I think about it.

Reverse: Voyager

Advertisement

Here is an old TV documentary about it:

Neutral: How Are You?

Season’s greetings, however or whatever you celebrate. I’m going to go listen to “A Long December” now, again.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


Screenshot: YouTUbe

In the lovely little village of Jaala, Finland, there lives a man named Tuomas Katainen, and Tuomas is the owner of a 2013 Tesla Model S. At first, Tuomas enjoyed his Tesla, but then it started throwing all kinds of codes and spent a month in a dealer’s shop, where it was discovered that it needed an entire new battery pack. For 20,000 euros. Luckily, Tuomas had a backup plan in place: blow it up with dynamite.

Advertisement

Screenshot: YouTUbe

Now, sure, 20,000 euros is an awful lot and changing out a Tesla battery pack is a huge pain in the ass, but it’s not quite like that amount of money would have necessarily totaled the car. Used 2013 Model Ss in Finland look like they go for over 35,000 euros, easy.

But would fixing the car be more satisfying than telling the Tesla dealership something like this:

Screenshot: YouTUbe

Probably not. Some things are just worth more than mere money.

So, a plan came together: an old quarry was found, friends were enlisted, and about 66 pounds of dynamite was sourced, and from what I can tell, dynamite looks almost exactly like big salamis:

Screenshot: YouTUbe

Advertisement

Look at that! You could hang a bunch of those from the ceiling of a deli and no one would realize the destructive potential contained there, lurking above the rye and mustard.

Oh, they also stuck a mannequin-like thing—or maybe just a stuffed snowsuit—in the car with an Elon Musk face on it, dropping it to the location via helicopter, confirming for me that I really have no idea who this guy is or what kind of resources he has to play with:

Screenshot: YouTUbe

Advertisement

Anyway, that’s the general story: you piss off a Finn with a cripplingly-expensive repair, and shit’s gonna get blown up. So watch:

Holy crap, right?

I like that this video does pose the hard question we’re all likely thinking:

Screenshot: YouTUbe

Advertisement

…and gives us the answer:

Screenshot: YouTUbe

Advertisement

Well, there you go. The man got what he wanted!


For GREAT deals on a new or used Nissan check out Nissan of Yuba City TODAY!

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


Photo: BMW

BMW said Friday that it would stop making internal combustion engines at its Munich plant by 2024, in another step towards going even more in the direction of electric. This is not an end to new internal combustion engine production for BMW, but it feels like the beginning of the end.

Advertisement

From Reuters:

The ICE engines currently made in Munich will be produced in BMW’s factories in Austria and the UK in future, production chief Milan Nedeljkovic said, though cars using the engines will still be assembled at the Munich plant.

Still, by 2023 at least half the vehicles produced in Munich would be electrified - either battery electric or plug-in hybrid, the company said.

BMW has set itself a target for at least 50% of new global car sales to be electric by 2030, and CEO Oliver Zipse said at a conference last week the company would be ready with an all-electric offering if any market banned ICEs by then.

BMW’s next big EV offering — in America, at least — is the iX, which is intended to be Tesla Model X competitor and which is really quite good and, at $83,200, is significantly cheaper than the $99,990 Model X. There is also the i4, which seems like a Model 3 competitor, or possibly a Model Y competitor if you want to be generous, and starts at $56,395. The i4 will also be the first all-electric BMW M car.

Europe, meanwhile, still gets the i3, which is no longer offered in the U.S., probably because it is a small electric car that was also very expensive, a particularly bad combination for the American market, even if the i3 was fine for what it was. Of the two all-electric BMWs that are coming to the U.S., the iX seems like it has the best shot, a car for people who live in the Northeast offended by Tesla and Elon Musk’s new-money vibe. I can’t wait, in a couple years, to see a bunch of them in Maine.

For GREAT deals on a new or used Chevrolet check out Winter Chevrolet TODAY!

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


Elon Musk hasn’t made a secret of his recent distaste for California, and his preference for Texas. He called the California’s COVID restrictions “fascist,” he’s expressed a concerning lack of opinion on Texas’s anti-abortion law, and he’s already moved into a tiny home on SpaceX’s Austin campus.

Advertisement

Now, he’s taking his company on the move as well. Musk announced at an investor meeting Thursday that Tesla would officially move its headquarters from Palo Alto to Austin, long before its Texas factory is fully completed.

Initially, when Musk listed his California properties for sale, some thought his move to Texas was simply a personal tax dodge. Texas’s state constitution famously forbids income tax, a provision Musk would likely enjoy should he decide to sell off any equity in Tesla. From CNBC:

Tesla’s board granted Musk an executive compensation package that can earn him massive stock awards based on the automaker’s market cap increases and some other financial targets. If he sells options set to expire in 2021, he could generate proceeds of more than $20 billion this year, according to InsiderScore.

When Tesla’s third-quarter earnings report listed its location as Austin rather than Palo Alto, however, the change didn’t go unnoticed. Official news of the move doesn’t come as a shock, but as a confirmation of rumors that have been swirling for days.

Advertisement

As usual with Tesla, many details have yet to be released. It’s unclear how many employees will be moved from Palo Alto to Austin, if any. Musk has made it clear that the Fremont factory will continue to grow, but didn’t discuss what difference the move might make for employees outside of Tesla’s production facilities.

For GREAT deals on a new or used Chrysler, Dodge, Jeep or RAM check out Envision CDJR West Covina TODAY!

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,


Gif: Chevy

Remember “crab walk” on the new Hummer EV? Sure you do. Well, it looks GM is also giving its upcoming electric Silverado a similar feature. Of course you’ll recall that this isn’t GM’s first attempt at adding four-wheel-steering capability to its trucks.  

Advertisement

It doesn’t look like “crab walk,” exactly, in the video that Chevy posted today, but those rear wheels are definitely steering. I could see this being useful in urban contexts, but also in off-road contexts as well. Chevy said four-wheel steering will be optional in the electric Silverado; also optional are 24-inch wheels.

The video includes this graphic:

Screenshot: Chevy

Chevy has not said when the electric Silverado will begin deliveries, though I wouldn’t expect it any sooner than late next year, and probably not until 2023. Until then, you can also expect drips and dabs from Chevy on all the cool new features it’s putting in the electric Silverado, which will compete with the Tesla Cybertruck (possibly), Ford F-150 Lightning, and probably an electric Ram 1500 too. There is also the Lordstown Endurance (haha) and the Rivian R1T, with the R1T a lot more of a sure thing than the Endurance, given all the money behind Rivian and all of the recent troubles at Lordstown.

Of those, the recently-delayed Cybertruck still probably holds the most intrigue, given that it is a fairly radical departure in terms of design, compared to the others. And while I still think that the Cybertruck is mainly for rich Californians with brains the size of peanuts, it also may not be, which would be the bigger surprise. The electric Silverado and F-150 Lightning, on the other hand, are for more practical buyers like fleets, and also Chevy and Ford fans who think they’re cool. The Rivian is probably the hipster choice here, along with the Bollinger B2, while I have no idea who the Endurance is for: Trump fans who care about the environment? Does that person even exist? Anyway, get ready for a lot of electric trucks.


For GREAT deals on a new or used Nissan check out Nissan of Sumter TODAY!

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

While Tesla is often recognized as one of the automakers at the forefront of electric sedan production, plenty of challengers have arisen to mount a challenge. Today, we’re going to see how a Ford Mustang Mach-E fares when compared to the Tesla Model Y.

Advertisement

This 25-minute video comes from The Fast Lane Car on YouTube. In it, father and son duo Roman and Tommy pick apart the pros and cons of both cars to come up with a winner.

One of the initial hangups the two men have to get past is Ford’s unfortunate naming. The Mach-E isn’t a Mustang, not the way we’ve come to culturally understand a Mustang. I’m noting it because one of my pet peeves is getting too caught up in a car’s name and not its actual performance, but in this case, I do kind of understand it. Ford beefed the name, and now the Mach-E is forever going to be compared to an ICE Mustang, which does not help the car.

Advertisement

Anyway, onto the video:

I’ll let you watch how they came to the conclusion, but both cars are pretty damn good—it just depends on how you want to use it. The Tesla Model Y, for example, is deemed to be the better electric vehicle while the Mach-E is said to be a better all-around car.

The main impression I get is that Ford has some catching-up to do, which doesn’t really surprise me. While the brand has a lot more long-term experience in the car-making world, its focus hasn’t been solely on electric cars, which are what define Tesla’s entire purpose.

But if you’ve been wondering how these two machines compare, look no further. You’ll get a step-by-step breakdown of everything from storage to technology to efficiency to help you decide which one you prefer.

Tags: , ,

Photo: Getty Images (Getty Images)

In a different universe, Apple would’ve shelved its own carmaking plans long ago and simply bought a car company that superficially conforms to Apple’s idea of itself and also seems to have in large part figured out how to mass-produce cars, which is extremely hard: You know, Tesla. That, of course, is not what happened.

Advertisement

But it might’ve, Tesla CEO Elon Musk said today, responding to another Twitter user who posted about Apple’s apparently rebooted car plans.

Advertisement

Tesla’s current market value is about $600 billion, so Musk is talking about Apple spending around $60 billion, which was more or less what Tesla’s valuation was for a number of years. That’s also a number that Apple could easily afford, and indeed might’ve been a great investment for them back in 2017 or 2018, when this theoretical meeting might have occurred.

Except that is very easy to say in hindsight, and back then Tesla very much wasn’t a sure thing. It’s also not totally assured that if Apple had bought Tesla that Tesla would’ve had the same trajectory as it did. What if Apple had bought Tesla and by virtue of doing that stopped its momentum? What if Apple had bought Tesla and decided that Elon wasn’t worth keeping around? What if Apple bought Tesla and decided that Elon didn’t know what the fuck he was doing but Apple did, putting Tesla back to automaking square one?

There are too many what-ifs, in other words, so Monday-morning-quarterbacking is a bit pointless, though you can understand why Elon is eager to spike the football. This could’ve been you, Apple, Elon is saying. Except that another version of this tweet is, “Apple didn’t want to buy my company when things were an absolute shitshow here, wonder why.” It’s true that not a lot of people like to acquire absolute shitshows.

We’ve also been here before. A couple times actually. In ten years, my best guess is that Apple will still be a phone and computer company and Tesla will still be a car company and for both that will have worked out just fine.

For GREAT deals on a new or used Mossy Nissan El Cajon check out Mossy Nissan El Cajon TODAY!

Tags: , ,

 

Photo: Getty Images

The Morning ShiftAll your daily car news in one convenient place. Isn’t your time more important?

The Ford Ranger is “the most American made,” the auto industry is mad it has to reduce CO2 emissions, and Tesla. All that and more in The Morning Shift for September 18, 2020.

Advertisement

1st Gear: Tesla

Reuters has a big feature on Tesla ahead of “Battery Day,” which is September 22, when Tesla is expected to unveil some new battery technologies. These are supposed to make the batteries last longer and be cheaper. This is all part of a push by Tesla to do more and more battery stuff on its own.

Advertisement

From Reuters:

New battery cell designs, chemistries and manufacturing processes are just some of the developments that would allow Tesla to reduce its reliance on its long-time battery partner, Japan’s Panasonic, people familiar with the situation said.

“Elon doesn’t want any part of his business to be dependent on someone else,” said one former senior executive at Tesla who declined to be named. “And for better or worse — sometimes better, sometimes worse — he thinks he can do it better, faster and cheaper.”

Tesla has battery production partnerships with Panasonic, South Korea’s LG Chem and China’s Contemporary Amperex Technology Co. that are expected to continue.

But at the same time, Tesla is moving to control production of cells — the basic component of EV battery packs — at highly automated factories, including one being built near Berlin, Germany, and another in Fremont, Calif., where Tesla is hiring dozens of experts in battery cell engineering and manufacturing.

“There has been no change in our relationship with Tesla,” Panasonic said in a statement provided by a company spokeswoman.

“Our relationship, both past and present has been sound. Panasonic is not a supplier to Tesla; we are partners. There’s no doubt our partnership will continue to innovate and contribute to the betterment of society.”

Tesla did not respond immediately to a request for comment.

2nd Gear: China Is Behind On Electric Vehicle Parts

China is the world’s biggest car market but a think tank there is worried that it’s falling behind on EV parts like semiconductors, according to Bloomberg:

China is pushing for greater self-reliance amid tensions with trade partners including the U.S. As the auto industry moves toward electrified and self-driving vehicles in a once-in-a-century shift, suppliers of software and semiconductors are gaining in importance.

“The supply-chain problem has to be solved,” [Zhang Yongwei, vice president of China EV 100, a high-profile electric-vehicle industry think tank] said at the industry gathering. An automobile powerhouse must have a strong supply chain of its own, he said.

China has been the world’s biggest vehicle market and producer for a decade, claiming about a third of the global total. But in semiconductors, China has only one company in the top 20, Zhang said. Less than 5% of automotive chips are made in the country and for some key components, carmakers rely 90% on imports, he said.

Meanwhile, semiconductor-based components are set to account for more than 50% of a car’s manufacturing cost by 2030, up from about 35% now, according to a report by China EV 100 and Roland Berger.

3rd Gear: Automakers Aren’t At All Excited About Even Tougher Emissions Standards Proposed In Europe

Pour one out for the automakers.

From Automotive News:

[European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen] proposed revising 2030 targets to mandate a reduction of CO2 emissions for the overall EU economy of at least 55 percent over 1990 levels, up from the 40 percent previously envisioned.

The implications for the auto industry are as yet unclear because von der Leyen did not mention passenger car fleet emissions targets. The Süddeutsche Zeitung reported last week that the , European Commission would propose increasing to 50 percent a planned 37.5 percent cut over 2021 levels, citing a leaked EU internal document.

Automakers fear the tougher target will require massive additional investments from the industry at a time when it has been badly hit by the coronavirus crisis.

“Policy makers need to put in place not only targets but also the required supportive policies for all vehicle types, without which these targets will simply not be achievable,” said Eric-Mark Huitema, director general of industry association ACEA.

[…]

“The higher the climate targets become, the higher and more critical the ambition level of these enabling factors must also be,” Huitema said.

The suppliers’ association CLEPA called for an “honest debate about the effects of policy decisions.”

Advertisement

4th Gear: GM’s Nikola Partnership Is Pretty Low-Risk For GM

That’s according to analysts that the Detroit Free Press talked to. The partnership, announced a week-and-a-half ago, didn’t include GM handing over any money. Per the Freep:

“The biggest risk right now is the risk of a huge PR black eye for (GM CEO) Mary Barra and the firm,” said Morningstar’s David Whiston. “Even though there isn’t much financial risk right now because the deal is initially cashless for GM, it still looks really bad optics-wise should Nikola be charged with criminal fraud or go bankrupt. But as a GM analyst, I’d rather have that risk than GM actually wastes billions of dollars buying Nikola stock.”

Analyst Sam Abuelsamid of Guidehouse Insights in Detroit agreed, saying GM has more to win than to lose.

“It’s all potential upside. The worst case for GM is that they take a minor reputational hit if things go sideways with Nikola. They’re not putting any cash in this deal,” Abuelsamid said. “They have a customer who will potentially buy their fuel cells and batteries. In return, they get a stake in a company that potentially has an upside valuation, compared to what it’s actually done.”

Advertisement

Will Nikola even be around this time next year? We’ll see.

5th Gear: The Ford Ranger Is The Most ‘Made In America’

It has 85 percent “total domestic content,” according to an index produced by American University, which includes parts but also research and development and company headquarters location. The economy has globalized to an extent that these sorts of indexes are kind of irrelevant—BMW, Mercedes, Volvo, Nissan, Honda, Toyota, Subaru, Kia, and Volkswagen all make cars on US soil—but the list is still interesting.

Advertisement

Via The Detroit News:

After the Ranger, the automatic transmission model of the Chevrolet Camaro was the second-most made in America vehicle in 2020 with 83% domestic content sourcing. The Corvette as well as the mid-size Chevrolet Colorado and GMC Canyon pickups tied for third with 82% domestic content. The Jeep Cherokee Latitude and Trailhawk SUVs were fourth with 78.5% domestic content.

The rest of the top 10 finishes as follows:

  • Tied for fifth with 77.5% domestic content: Three-liter Ford Explorer, Cadillac CT4 and CT5, and Tesla Model S and Y
  • Sixth with 77% domestic content: Cadillac XT4
  • Tied for seventh with 76% domestic content: Chevrolet Camaro with manual transmission, Caddilac XT5 and XT6, and GMC Acadia
  • Tied for eighth with 75.5% domestic content: Ford Expedition and Mustang with a 2.3-liter Ecoboost engine and 5.0-liter engine with automatic transmission
  • Tied for ninth with 75% domestic content: Five-liter Ford F-150, Lincoln Aviator, long-range Tesla Model 3, and Tesla Model X
  • Tenth with 74.5% domestic content: Jeep Cherokee

A better guide than “buy American” for consumers who give a shit is “buy union,” though sadly that confines you to the Big Three. No perfect choices out there.

Advertisement

Reverse: Mallrats

Advertisement

Neutral: How Are You?

I’m probably going to go to California for a few months this winter, so I spent roughly all day yesterday plotting various coast-to-coast routes from New York City. I honestly can’t wait for a long, depressing, monotonous drive through Kansas.

 

For GREAT deals on a new or used Nissan check out Fontana Nissan TODAY!

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,